After reading the New York Times
piece on BzzAgents this past Sunday, I'm convinced more then ever that this company is the analog version of
According to the Times story their agents lie and deceive folks to get their products out there.
Do we really want to live in a world where our friends are getting paid to pitch us on products all the time?
This is about disclosure, and BzzAgents go around—again, straight from the Times story—and pitch these products without ever telling their friends (a.k.a. subjects) about the fact that they are earning "BzzPoints" they can trade in for free products. Many of them, again according the Times story, never tell folks about the relationship they have with BzzAgent!
Agents in the story said they didn't think that their marketing efforts would work if they told their friends they were getting paid (or getting free product, another form of getting paid). Well, duh???!?!
Can you imagine your friend calling you up and saying "Hey David, it's Jason. I'm working with a great new company called Uncle Joe's Pork Sausages… did you know that Uncle Joe's only uses grade A quality swine in their sausages?" That could be the end of the relationship, I mean do you want your friends pitching you half the time like telemarketers? TIVO and HBO are so popular because they let you skip the commercials—are these marketers so desperate that they want to insert commercials into our daily interactions? At least on TV you know it's a commercial!
Relationships are built on trust and disclosure, and "word of mouth marketing," as the have dubed it, is based on
lying and deception. Even if you were to disclose what you're doing, it's so "icky" that people wouldn't want to be
involved with you. The truth is trust and deception can not both exist in the same place at the same time—something has
got to give.
In the Times they say over and over again that their company is based on Seth Godin's theories, but BzzAgents have got Seth all wrong.
I've read all of Seth Godin's books.
I first met Seth Godin in 1995 or 1996.
I've spent time with Seth Godin.
I wrote about Seth Godin and his compny Yoyodyne for years in Silicon Alley
BzzAgents… * YOU * ARE * NO * SETH * GODIN * !!!
In Seth's book he talks about great products leading to buzz and organic word of mouth. He specifically tells
companies to not waste their time and energy on creating fake buzz. Godin's concepts and observations are based on
great companies like Tivo or JetBlue making tons of little innovations that people love, remember, and talk about. No
where does Godin say "hire a company to get people to deceive their friends into thinking your product is
Of course, according to the Times story, Seth Godin's publisher hired these folks for his last book, and his book mentions the firm. Hmmmmmmm…. sounds sinister to me. Are we going to find out next that Seth has stock in the company?
The oddest part is that the Times story goes on to quote Seth himself:
New York Times: Seth Godin, the writer and speaker on marketing whose ideas partly inspired BzzAgent, agrees that the agents' honesty is crucial. Paying people to promote products, hiring supermodels to show up in a bar and request a particular vodka, is ''disingenuous, dishonest and almost unethical,'' and it represents a subversion of honest peer-to-peer communication. And honest peer-to-peer communication, he maintains, is the future of marketing.
OK, Seth, I get it. You don't think BzzAgents should be lairs, and you don't think they should be involved in
deception. Great, I agree!
However, the Times story goes on to question the deception that BzzAgents are doing when promoting books (not sure if they are referring to the promotion of your book Seth or other books—the Times story doesn't say, but I wish the writer of the story, BzzAgents or Seth would let me know):
New York Times: Those suggestions in the Bzz guides to call bookstores and pretend you don't know the exact title or author you're looking for are pretty hard to define as ''honest.'' Similarly, it's most unlikely that Amazon.com (let alone The Concord Monitor) would consider the reviews of a BzzAgent quite as unbiased and helpful to readers as a review from someone who hadn't consulted talking points compiled with input from the publisher. The whole tone of the Bzz guides — which read like a cross between a brochure and a training manual — is a bit difficult to square with the idea of genuineness.
Seth, now that you know that BzzAgents are using your name and concepts to lie and deceive the
public, are you willing to come out and says that you don't support these activities? I guess you don't have to come
out and say this, since you already did in the Times story!
Come on Seth, these guys are basing their company on a bastardized version of your clearly stated beliefs—are you cool with that? Stand up and call them out on it. Are you going to just sit there and let them convince the world that lying is ok, and that you by extension edorse their behavior?!
Superman where are you?!?!!? We need you Superman!
When William Gibson wrote about these concepts in his
book it was a WARNING, not something to be strived towards!
As I said when I started, BzzAgents are the new spammers. They use any method to get your attention, and—at least according to the Times story—they are well-skilled at the art of deception and lying.
Word of mouth marketing companies will wind up in the back alleys of the marketing world, along with the spammers,
spyware folks, and those evil people who print advertisements on the back of fake parking tickets (thanks, I really
need to have all that stress as I walked up to my
car today… now I associate your brand with anxiety and being angry—NICE JOB IDIOTS!!!).
The most reprehensible thing about all this is that these slimy companies without ethics are joining forces to create a Word of Mouth Marking Organization (WOMMA). BzzAgent has the WOMMA logo on their site as if the fact that they are part of this organization makes their behavior ok.
WOMMA claims they are going to bring ethics to word of mouth ma